How much sympathy can be offered to the umpires?

The answer to this question is highly convoluted and complex. The umpires carry a huge amount of pressure on themselves out in the middle. They are human and do make mistakes.

The point to be noted is that, there are unintentional errors and then the more dangerous intentional errors, which are very common in the lower strata of the game. Either bias towards one team or one individual or at a higher level racism causes these intentional blunders. There is absolutely no doubt in the fact that these intentional cases cannot be excused at any level, in any situation and at any cost. But, the problem is that it is usually the case that the umpire in question is the only one who truly knows whether the decision taken was an honest one. Therefore, however capable an umpire may be, his integrity is more important than anything else as the players and the general public are inclined to excuse a wrong decision more when they believe that the decision was taken in all honesty.

The umpires do a very tough job. The cause of an incorrect decision is important to consider. A great majority of umpires give decisions correctly 100% of the time, based on what they see. The point here is that the decision goes wrong when they don’t see or hear something crucial. Therefore, it is the incomplete or otherwise flawed input and not the processing that goes wrong. An alert umpire will give more correct decisions than one who is not alert. The words of a former test umpire, “All the decisions I gave were right, from what I saw” convey this point clearly. Therefore it has to be noted and reiterated that a good umpire gives all his decisions, without exception correctly, based on what he sees.

Decisions such as the question of whether there is a nick with the ball going down the leg side through to the ‘keeper with the batsman attempting a pull or hook pose problems for the umpire. The reason is the umpire does not get as clear a sight of the incident as he would have been comfortable with due to the angle. The bat-pad decisions are also challenging although these are considerably easier than the decisions previously dealt with. The problem with the bat-pad decisions is that under normal circumstances, the bat and pad are very close to each other, therefore any deflection will happen very fast and what got the first touch and whether there were two touches at all is not clear in the umpire’s mind.

One may argue that a good umpire must be capable of negotiating all these decisions and dealing with them appropriately. This is true, but even the greatest of umpires are human beings and they will make mistakes, more likely in these cases.

Therefore, in difficult decisions such as these, there should be a level of leniency in judging the umpire.

There is one more factor which comes in – the situation. An umpire cannot give a caught behind decision half as easily at the Eden Gardens as against Hove because of the noisy atmosphere at Calcutta. Also, a mistake the umpire makes is given importance on the basis of the victim as well. The uproar caused by Sachin Tendulkar being wrongly declared out will certainly be much more than the similar decision with Alan Donald at the receiving end.

There will be mistakes made and that is the beauty of the game. I hope my opinions are portrayed clearly through this piece.-BS

Seasons Greetings

Cricket Opinions wishes all its readers first, then everyone else a very successful and happy new year 2008. Cricket Opinions began some time in January 2007 under a different name and therefore the coming of January 2008 will mean that this page has existed for one year. Seems like just yesterday this began, doesn’t it? Cricket Opinions wishes to thank all who supported this endeavour.
-Editor

Message

Cricket Opinions wishes to thank its readers for posting comments and will deal with the issues asked for by the readers by the 2nd of January of the new year.
-Editor

The Unfortunate Mr.Hussey

He scored piles of runs in the first class level, waiting for his test call up for Australia. It was only after he got his 15,513^th run that he finally got to play a test match. Michael Hussey is one of the most consistent batsmen in the Australian side. He exploits every opportunity to score a few. Yet, he does not receive the recognition due to him.

He scored 1 run in his first test innings. Since then, he has made only two other single digit scores in the other 28 innings he took active part in. In these 29 innings, he’s scored 7 tons and 8 scores between 50 and hundred. Considering any score of above 50 to be a useful contribution, out of the 29 innings Hussey has taken part in, he’s contributed usefully in 15 innings. Also, in four innings where he scored under 50, he remained not out. And the final point, his test match average – 86.18.

Why is it that a batsman of such credentials does not get as much recognition as the Ponting, Lara or Tendulkar?

When Michael Hussey comes in to bat at the usual number four or number five position, there is no doubt about the fact that the crowd is not as interested as when the skipper enters the field. One can argue that over the period of twelve years of Ponting’s international career, he has proved himself to be amongst the top batsmen of the generation.

This may be true. But, Hussey’s credentials certainly deserve more recognition. The most plausible cause for Hussey not receiving this recognition is his style of play. He will bat all day, all test if needed, go about his job, doing all that he can within his jurisdiction to achieve a favourable result for his team, all the while scoring at a good rate. He will not be the subject of an eye-catching batting display that the Tendulkars or Laras are accustomed to giving us.

The aesthetic pleasure one gains by watching that full circle cover drive of Lara and those incomplete drives of Tendulkar is not something you get watching Hussey. Hussey is a batsman. He is in the team to make runs. He will do that unconditionally and without any sparkle. He will consistently make runs for the team and help contribute to the team’s performance.

When Hussey walks in to bat, there is a sense of security that he will score, at a decent rate, keep the scoreboard ticking, regardless of whether he does it with style or show. He is described aptly by many as a “matter-of-fact batsman.”

Other than his style, the fact that the Aussie administrators drafted him into the style so late in his first class career itself is a factor for his lack of popularity. The point here is that, the Aussie selectors find it hard to adjust to the fact that a player picked so late has performed to such a great extent. They are recognising how much they have missed Hussey’s talent all these years when he was waiting for selection.

We will never know how much Australian cricket lost by picking one of the greatest Aussie batsmen of this generation so late in his career.-BS

It’s One Tough Job

Something crucial happens. For less than a second, a decisive event occurs, and millions of people all around you and all around the world are glued to the action. All of a sudden these millions are looking at you for your opinion on the event. Your opinion can change the situation; change not just the victim’s day or week, but possibly even his whole life. You have a man screaming right into your ears imploring of you to pass your decision in his favour, while his opponent stands, looking at you, for it is your opinion that counts.

This is just a cricket field. And you are “just” the umpire. This is just a test match with a bowler appealing for an LBW decision, supported by at least 5000 others.

Yes, as an umpire you don’t gain much attention, but at this point when the cricketing world stands still to look at you for your verdict, all attention is towards you. Worse, it is a possibility in some countries that there are around one lakh people shouting their pleas at you. Yet, you know, that you have to remove all this from your point of view and come to your decision completely impartially.

Doing this much is tough enough. But this is just after the event occurs. What about the event itself? What goes on in the umpire’s mind when the bowler’s foot lands on the popping crease and when that red little thing leaves the bowler’s hand?

First up, his eyes are fixed steadfast on the popping crease, searching for the landing foot. Ah, there it comes. Once it lands, the umpire has just about 0.05 to 0.1 seconds to decide whether the bowler violated the law or not. He has just about one tenths of a second to make call no ball if necessary. Note: he has one tenths of a second to not just arrive at his decision, but also scream “NO BALL!!!” whenever necessary. His job is nowhere near complete.

Once he has executed the necessary procedure at this stage, his eyes look up, in front of him, searching for the cherry in the air. And they have to move fast. The cherries of some fast bowlers of the world take about 0.3 to 0.4 seconds to get to the other end. The umpire’s eyes have to not only locate the ball, but also focus on it before it even hits the ground. The ball usually hits the ground a little after half its journey to the batsman.

But, there’s no point just looking. He must also have prior knowledge and a perfectly precise judgement of where the three stumps are. For, he has to draw an imaginary line on the pitch all the way down from the striker’s wickets to the pitch of the ball. He has to no exactly where the ball pitched. Whether he ball pitched within the line of the stumps is crucial knowledge in LBWs.

So the journey of the cherry continues. The umpire looks at where the ball pitches, makes a mental note of the issue and looks on. That sentence makes it seem very easy. Permit me to reiterate. The umpire has no time to look at the stumps. He has to acknowledge the exact position of the pitch of the ball with respect to what he thinks is the area which is directly, perpendicularly in line with the wickets.

The ball keeps moving, doesn’t bother whether the umpire’s got it right or not and reaches the batsman. This is where the mind of the umpire is completely focussed. The umpire has to ensure that all the hard work he’s done this far will go to waste if he loses his focus now. The amount of concentration of the umpire at this stage is amazing.

My judgement says that not even the best umpires in the world or the greatest brains in the world can keep this kind of concentration going for longer than 10 seconds. True, the umpire has to keep it for just about 5; but take note: not even the best brains in the world can keep it going for ten seconds.

Coming back to the cherry, there are numerous possibilities as to what happens when it reaches the batsman. On no two occasions will the events be the same. The umpires get new ones each time. But, apart from exceptional cases, the happenings are usually the same prima facie. The umpire now has to keep his ears open as well. If it’s in the direction of the batsman’s body, he has to tune his ear to pick up the number of noises and the kind of noises. The number has to be picked up to see whether the ball just touched pad or also got the bat. And the type to understand whether it hit the bat, glove, pad, helmet, body, or nothing at all.

Remember, the ears only act as backup to the eyes, but let alone the naked eye, even the fastest of cameras, even the ultra-motion cameras are in some cases not capable of reacting or perceiving so as to acknowledge minute deviations in the balls path. If the umpire hears wood, he relaxes his mind to a small extent, recognising that the LBW is now out of the question. Ah, but it isn’t that easy, here’s the catch, he has to hear wood before he hears anything else, for there is the possibility of the ball getting ricocheted off the pad or any other part of the batsman’s person onto the bat.

Now the umpire’s mind starts to process the various possibilities. Let us go into the first one, the ball having either touched just the person or the bat after the person. There comes the question of the LBW – the decision which proves the umpire’s mettle. He has to retrieve from his memory where the ball pitched, whether outside the line of leg stump of not. Then he must observe; whether the ball hits the person of the batsman in line with the stumps or not, and if outside the line of off stump, he must judge whether the batsman offered a stroke or not; which way the ball was moving, whether it would have gone on to hit the stumps if not for the person; and whether the height was too much. These are the basics.

If all the criteria are in favour of the bowler, the umpire must rule the batsman out, if in his opinion the delivery is a legitimate one. To ascertain this, he must retrieve from his memory the bowler’s foot at the popping crease and some other factors.

Now that he has arrived at his LBW verdict, he can relax a little bit, but has to keep his eyes on the proceedings and look whether he is required to increase his level of concentration for the chance of a run out. All the while he must keep a constant eye on the players, their behaviour and so on. In this, he will be helped by his colleague at square leg.

The whole situation changes if the ball is not directed towards the batsman’s person. The umpire’s ear now works harder than his eye to pick any small snick. In coordination with his eyes, if his ears hear a sound, his eyes will search and attempt to find out whether the noise was from bat hitting ball. If not, then he will look into other possibilities. But if so, he has to ensure that if the ball goes to a fielder or the keeper, the catch is completed legally.

This is just a small insight on few things the umpire does, the tougher side. Apart from this, the umpire needs an absolutely fluent knowledge of the laws of the game and has to undertake countless procedures pre match and post match.

The trick for an umpire lies in maintaining this high level of concentration over five days of six playing hours each. This is why it’s good to socialise with players and have a chat about the quality of the food, the beautiful sights to see in the area, sometimes how good a player is, etc. All this of course is between two balls bowled. It is important to note that it is physically and scientifically impossible for an umpire to take stock of the situation when a ball is being bowled as mentioned earlier and consciously arrive at so many decisions in such a short span of time. This is where the years of practice come in. At one stage of his career, the umpire’s mind can do all this subconsciously without the umpire consciously actually taking part in taking the decision. He only has to ensure that he takes in all the data, the mind will automatically process this data and arrive at a verdict. The umpire’s mind will automatically inform him on the verdict.

All the umpire has to do therefore, – if he is experienced – is take the data and wait and listen to what his subconscious mind thinks. Later, after the game, just when the umpire thinks he can relax, there are a large number of people questioning all his decisions out of which few know what they’re talking about. Umpiring is like taking candy from a baby – surprisingly difficult.-BS

For Sishu Griha Readers

Cricket Opinions warmly welcomes all its new readers from Sishu Griha Montessori and High School – those who have come here on reading the advertisement in the school’s newsletter. We are sorry to inform you that due to the editor’s coming board examination, blog updation will not be as often as expected or usual.-BS
Thank You for reading, keep coming back

Aww…

Cricket Opinions – ‘The Right Place For The Right Opinions’ is sorry to inform you that due to the short time remaining for the editor’s 10th standard board examinations, the frequency of articles being published on your favourite blog will not be as much as you like. Another way to look at it is that you’ll be hungry for more and keep coming back. The editor apologises but believes that he’s got his priorities right – this time at least. Keep note – this does not mean there wont be any new articles, just that there wont be as many.

Cricket Opinions also takes this opportunity to inform you that feedback, suggestions, queries, etc can be mailed to southpaw.me@gmail.com, and not to owner@cricketopinions.ath.cx as previously informed.

Thank You for patronising Cricket Opinions

India’s Bowling Woes

So often we have seen the Indians put up a bulky total batting first – periodically thanks to a certain Tendulkar – and then also watch the bowling let all the prior effort down. There are a few ways to look at this problem

The flaw which stands out amongst others is sheer lack of consistency – the key aspect of bowling which the recently named Indian Test Captain Anil Kumble possesses and utilises to his great advantage. The bowlers all look good. Take R.P.Singh as the example; rhythmic run into the crease, one flow right from the top of his run up to the end of his follow through, nice shape on the ball and great use of the left arm over the wicket angle. Unfortunately for RP, in addition to all this technical correctness, there is this other factor which helps determine the true ability of a bowler from a more holistic point of view.

Cricket is tough – more so for bowlers. One who bowls five ‘peaches’ and gets hit for six of the last ball still has the rather unnoteworthy ordinary economy rate of 6.00. This is what happens to the Indian bowlers.

The Indian medium pacers have developed a typical over which goes something like this. Dot, beaten, beaten, one stolen run, (this is when the commentator says “It’s been a good over so far.”), on the pads, clipped for two and overcompensation from the bowler, wide and cut away for four. That’s seven runs off the over.

Even five mediocre deliveries which give away singles and one dot is better than this. The bowlers may argue that pressure has been put on the batsman with the ball passing the bat frequently. What use is putting the pressure on the batsman if a succeeding ball is there to be hit away?

This is something this Indian bowlers really have to work on.-BS

Advantage Southpaw

In a world dominated by right handers, the left handers possess some advantages in sports. Here’s a look at some advantages in cricket.

The left handed bowler has considerably more advantages than the left handed batsman. The main point is the angle. Everything is laterally inverted in the eyes of the batsman. Out swing for the left arm medium pacer is in swing for the right handed batsman. Out swing is executed easier by bowlers around the world and therefore is also played better than in swing well by batsmen as well. So that’s two in one – the left arm medium pacer can execute the simple out swing and have the right handed batsman handle the tougher in swingers.

Furthermore, in the case of pace bowlers, the angle left arm over the wicket is like a boon. The natural angle of a left arm over the wicket bowler to a right handed batsman is away from the latter. If the bowler then generates in swing to the right hander, the ball has the freedom to do quite a bit in the air to negate the angle. The bowler also therefore has so much to work with. He can have many balls go straight with the angle outside the off stump and strategically bowl one which moves into the unsuspecting batsman.

This is just the lesser of the two advantages of the left arm over the wicket angle. The other is the movement of the pitch. Picture this – a left arm seamer bowling left arm over the wicket with a steady rhythmic run, delivers the ball which goes straight with the angle away from the right hander, pitches on middle and off stump and seams back into the right handed batsman to trap him in front with the ball probably going on to hit off and middle.

That’s the delivery every left arm seamer dreams of. Ryan Sidebottom has done much of this on the Indian tour. Also, the bowlers gain great pleasure in setting up the batsman for the killer ball. Also, to have a batsman like Dravid at the receiving end with his technical flaw being exposed with his head leaning too far over the line of the ball….its all too good.

The left arm spinner has some great advantages as well; the first and foremost being that the orthodox bowler bowls off spin – which has to be handled like a leg spinner by a right hander.

Once again, in the case of left arm spinners, like in the case of seamers, the angle makes a whole lot of difference. The off spinner, either left handed or right handed, finds it much easier to get drift as against the leg spinner.

In the case of the left arm off spinner, this drift is coming into the right hander and then the ball turns away from him. This is more attacking than the ball spinning into the right hander. God always evens it out somewhere. The more attacking style of bowling, leg spin is more difficult to execute than off spin. This is where we left handers have a great advantage.

What about the left handed batsmen? It’s elementary. There are much more right handers on this planet than southpaws, and that makes it more difficult for the bowlers to adjust to them. Changing the lines all the time, playing around with the angle, etc are not easy jobs.-BS

Runs of the ricochet

The laws of cricket have been played with so often, always legitimately (in the recent past at least), sometimes with satisfactory reason and sometimes without. There now seems to be another need for an amendment in the laws. The issue in question is not one that is new, but one that has inexplicably left the laws unchanged for so many years.

The matter is whether runs should be awarded off a ricochet off the stumps in the form of overthrows. The situation is as follows. A fielder receives and collects the ball and throws it at the stumps in an effort to get a batsman run out, the ball hits the stumps and breaks the wicket (not literally but in terms of Law number 28 – the wicket is down) following which the ball ricochets off the wicket. The point being raised is that, following this ricochet, any runs taken should be disallowed by an amendment of the laws.

The primary point of argument is that a fielder cannot be penalised for good fielding. Overthrows after the ricochet means that if a fielder is good enough to hit the stumps, he faces the danger of conceding a few runs in the form of overthrows. This only discourages good fielding. The purpose of the fielder’s shy at the stumps is to hit it. If he succeeds, he deserves credit for it rather than penalisation.

There may be the argument that the fielders may start intentionally throwing the ball at the stumps just to prevent any further runs. In order to prevent this, the law must clearly state;

“In the event of the ball, when in play, being thrown towards the wicket by a fielder who the umpire at the end in question believes has the sole intent of achieving a run out, and breaking the wicket as defined in Law 28, the ball shall immediately be declared dead, with any runs that are taken subsequently being disallowed.”

Although an amendment is necessary, a lot of research is left to be done regarding the issue. The disadvantage of this law, if introduced as above, is that it will make the job difficult for the umpires.

Also, what should take place if the umpires believe that the intent is not to achieve a run out but only to save the runs? A lot to think about for the ICC.-BS